Essays in Philosophy of Religion (Jostarhaye Falsafeh Din)

Assessment and critical comparison of Tabataba'i, Motahari and Javadi Amoli's views on the unity of existence and its theological elements

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

marzieh rezaie 1
Hamidreza Ayatollahy 2
Mohammad saeedimehr 3

1 Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Faculty of Theology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Philosophy at Allameh Tabatabai University

3 Professor of Philosophy Department of Tarbiat Modarres University

Abstract
One of the important issues in the philosophy of religion is the issue of the unity of the world and its relation to the unity of God. These different perceptions of the unity of the universe have been challenged by the unity of existence.In this paper, we are going to elucidate the viewpoints of the Muslim philosophers of the Transcendent Philosophy School with this discussion and evaluate their arguments and show the superiority of some of the views of others. In this regard, the viewpoints of Sadr's wisdom commentators who have contradictory opinions have been selected and their analysis has been analyzed.. Allameh Tabatabai, who is sometimes inclined to some form of unity, sometimes personal, sometimes also interprets the two-word consistency. Ultimately, he accepts the solid arguments of personal unity, but he does not have the ability to answer doubts. Motahari, who opposes the unity of existence, negation, negation, and neglect of possible possibilities, ultimately, by Allameh Javadi Amoli, with the proof of the "Absolute Absolute" and placing "being" and "appearing" against "lack of" defects that prevent the application of philosophy based on unity Were eliminated, so the way to change many topics was opened. In this paper, we intend to have a critical comparison of the views of these three thinkers.

Keywords

unity of existence
personal
arrogance
Tabatabai
Motahari
Javadi Amoli
جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1393). عین نضاخ، قم: انتشارات اسراء.
جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1389). رحیق مختوم، قم: انتشارات اسراء.
جوارشکیان، عباس (1379). نقد و تحلیل نحوة فاعلیت خداوند، تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
سوزنچی، حسین (1389). وحدت وجود در حکمت متعالیه، دانشگاه امام صادق علیه السلام.
صدرالمتألهین شیرازی، محمد (1981). اسفار اربعه، انتشارات بیروت.
طباطبایی، محمدحسین (1371). نهایۀ الحکمه، تهران: صدرا.
طهرانی، محمد‌حسین (1389). توحید علمی و عینی در مکاتب حکمی و عرفانی، نشر مشهد.
مدرس مطلق، سیدعلی (1379). وحدت وجود، نشر پرسش.
مطهری، مرتضی(1385). مجموعه آثار، تهران: انتشارات صدرا.
مطهری، مرتضی(1386). اصول فلسفه و روش رئالیسم، تهران: صدرا.
مطهری، مرتضی(1378). عرفان حافظ، تهران: صدرا.
مطهری، مرتضی (1361). شرح منظومه، تهران: حکمت.
مطهری، مرتضی (1369). حرکت و زمان، تهران: حکمت.
هاشمی‌نسب، سید مرتضی (1393). تأملی بر نظریة اصالت وجود و وحدت وجود، انتشارات دلیل ما.
 
Harrison, P. (2013). Elements of Pantheism; Religious reverence of nature and the universe, Coral Springs, Florida: Llumina Press.
Levine, M.P. (1994). Pantheism; A non-theistic concept of deity, London: Routledge.
Mander, William (2016).‘Pantheism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,(Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =.
Moran, D. (1990). ‘Pantheism from John ScottusEriugena to Nicholas of Cusa’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 64(1): 131–152.
Essays in Philosophy of Religion (Jostarhaye Falsafeh Din)
Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 15
January 2018
Pages 91-109

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us