A main part of contemporary religious epistemology consists of debates on the problem of validity of evidentialism. Generally contemporary epistemology tends to refuse evidentialism because this view establishes a stricter measure for justification. Most important reaction to this view can be seen in well-formed epistemology that takes some religious beliefs and see them not in need to sufficient justification. In this article we argue that: 1. well-formed epistemology can’t solve the charge of arbitrariness; consequently, 2. this view isn’t defensible; and 3. religious beliefs in another sense can be seen foundational: in foundational meaning for knowledge’s whole claim and approaching to truth (refusing the radical skepticism).
Ramezani,R . (2013). Religious Epistemology and the Scope of Foundational Propositions; Considering and Criticizing a View in Well-Formed Epistemology. Essays in Philosophy of Religion (Jostarhaye Falsafeh Din), 1(2), 51-97.
MLA
Ramezani,R . "Religious Epistemology and the Scope of Foundational Propositions; Considering and Criticizing a View in Well-Formed Epistemology", Essays in Philosophy of Religion (Jostarhaye Falsafeh Din), 1, 2, 2013, 51-97.
HARVARD
Ramezani R. (2013). 'Religious Epistemology and the Scope of Foundational Propositions; Considering and Criticizing a View in Well-Formed Epistemology', Essays in Philosophy of Religion (Jostarhaye Falsafeh Din), 1(2), pp. 51-97.
CHICAGO
R Ramezani, "Religious Epistemology and the Scope of Foundational Propositions; Considering and Criticizing a View in Well-Formed Epistemology," Essays in Philosophy of Religion (Jostarhaye Falsafeh Din), 1 2 (2013): 51-97,
VANCOUVER
Ramezani R. Religious Epistemology and the Scope of Foundational Propositions; Considering and Criticizing a View in Well-Formed Epistemology. Essays in Philosophy of Religion. 2013;1(2):51-97 (In Persian).
